Ethical Healthcare Practices in Bangladesh

Ethical Healthcare Practices in Bangladesh Description: Therapeutic decorum is the shared connection between individuals from the restorative calling. At the end of the day, it is a feeling of kindness and regard, which ought to represent the lead of and relationship among the individuals from the medicinal calling. In Bangladesh, restorative specialists have generally appreciated the most astounding admiration among various callings. Propels in medicinal and wellbeing sciences and their being highlighted in the broad communications have made individuals such a great amount of cognizant about their wellbeing and wellbeing rights. Bangladesh Medical and Dental Council is the body to manage the lead of the Medical Professionals of  Bangladesh. After graduation they need to enroll themselves with the committee. They need to consent to maintain the codes of statement. The therapeutic practice in Bangladesh is represented by enactment and medicinal laws, which are upheld by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Healing facilities, cente rs and indicative focuses are additionally administered by government directions. Doctors play out their expert work in similarity with these controls. Be that as it may, requirement of these demonstrations or laws does not appear to happen all the time. Current Situation: Human rights activists and the Consumer Association of Bangladesh are additionally making individuals mindful about their wellbeing rights. They are presently worried about the medicinal services offices accessible in centers and healing facilities and what they get from individual specialists. They are notwithstanding scrutinizing the cost of medicinal services. The desires of individuals are expanding. Instances of carelessness and misbehavior with respect to doctors are being conveyed to courts with the outcome that expert associations, for example, the Bangladesh Medical Association and its individuals are getting to be plainly aware of their set of accepted rules and moral conduct. At present Bangladesh is experiencing a social change, monetary development and expanding uniqueness, broadening of crevice amongst poor and rich, expanding education, strengthening of ladies, expanded wellbeing mindfulness, expanding future, diminishing baby mortality and maternal mortality. There is a change of way of life of the general population and family progression, wellbeing looking for conduct, change of data innovation and quick urbanization. These are the difficulties in the wellbeing administration. In Bangladesh, both people in general and private segments give therapeutic administrations. Out in the open area there are shortcomings of pleasantries and beds. It is stuffed and the doctors need to confront the moral quandary in their decision of treatment and need. In private part it is expensive and past the compass of destitute individuals. There is an absence of good observing and legitimate laws. Whats more, headways in transplantation and helped propagation require new directions of restorative morals. In showing Medical Ethics provincial legacy is being taken after. It is educated in the bureau of legal solution accentuating carelessness and negligence; yet restorative understudies for the most part take after the expert direct of their seniors instead of learning through reading material and class guidelines. It is the ideal opportunity for rebuilding the rules of therapeutic morals and fuses them in the undergrad restorative educational modules, fortifying the Medical Council, sharpening the doctors and overhauling the important laws. The primary issue in the instructing of morals is that instructors have little information about restorative morals, decorum and set of principles. Likewise, therapeutic understudies dont have much enthusiasm for finding out about medicinal morals as they view different subjects as more vital for qualifying the examination. In addition, proficient lead and behavior are learnt by perception as opposed to through the perusing of books. To create mindfulness about moral qualities among understudies, more significance ought to be given to the instructing of medicinal morals. More accentuation ought to be given to the improvement of understudies state of mind in the course educational modules of medicinal morals with the goal that they can pick up and soak up information about moral practice. It ought to be the obligation of every single proficient association to maintain the guideline of restorative morals and expert lead. The BMDC, the Nursing Council, the Pharmacy Council and the State Medical Faculty ought to be fortified to empower them to screen wellbeing instruction and wellbeing administrations with the goal that individuals can get ideal care from specialists and government wellbeing administrations. Wellbeing organizers, policymakers and implementers ought to offer need to moral issues in medicinal and partnered instruction and in addition therapeutic practice. They ought to give specialized support to medicinal organizations so they can create and actualize a coordinated educational modules for the instructing of morals. A few variables can be forced all together prompt a superior moral condition in the medicinal business: Students rarely find a role model among their teachers for ethical practice. Penalization in case of misconduct can enforce the code of conduct strictly needs to be followed Integrated teaching of ethics in clinical years can be a better setting A structured curriculum for the teaching of ethics needs to be prepared for health professionals, including medical students and doctors. The nature of MNH care is poor in area and sub-region clinics in Bangladesh on account of an absence of human services work force and strategic support, including gear, fundamental medications, and lab needs. This data could be utilized to fortify the national-level approach for enhancing the nature of MNH care at the offices. In each kind of open clinic in Bangladesh, there range settled number of human services work force and a settled measure of calculated support, as determined by the GoB. Be that as it may, the number of inhabitants in each region or sub-area is not the same. In this way, an adjustment in the approach is required to guarantee the appropriation of human services staff and strategic support ought to be proportionate to populace of the area or sub-region. In our review, it was additionally uncovered that human services suppliers were disappointed with their nature of care; nonetheless, the greater part of their patients were happy with their level of care. This is mostly in light of the fact that the patients were ignorant of their wellbeing rights. A mindfulness raising movement ought to be propelled to teach patients that it is their entitlement to get quality care.

Reading Written Works And Watching TV Essay

Books are known as the first medium bearing the function of conveying information to people; they were invented about 5000 years ago. If books can be considered as the traditional medium, television is the modern one. In fact, it was first introduced in public in the late 1920s and soon became a significant part of the daily life. Both of these media provide people with information, news as well as knowledge, but each kind has some distinct features. The similarities as well as the differences between reading books and watching TV vary, but they can be divided into three main aspects: the activity factor, entertainment and social interaction. The first critical aspect differentiating reading written works and watching television is the activity factor. The activeness of mental activity between reading and watching TV is significantly different. While reading book, one can readily imagine the scene of the book in his or her mind and decode what the author means, which can help one imp rove his or her imagination. see more:tv is better than books In contrast, watching TV makes one receive images passively, which means his or her imagination is controlled by others. Ordway (2010) states that compared to reading books, watching TV is noticeably less strenuous. In addition, when reading, one can control his or her time and activated more effectively than watching TV. For instance, one can either increase or reduce his or her reading speech, re-read pages or chapters he or she likes, all of which one cannot do while watching TV. However, both reading printed works and watching TV are involved in little physical activities. Secondly, the similarities and differences between reading and watching TV can be demonstrated through the entertainment. In general, the target that both reading and watching TV aim at is to entertain people. People often either read books or watch TV when they have free time or want to relax after a hard working day. However, the levels of entertainment are not the same. Reading books requires one more power and time to transfer words into images; thus, one is more likely to keep in his or her mind the content of the books. As a result, it can be said that reading a deeper level of entertainment. However, every stick has two ends; certain kinds of entertainment may not be available in books such as live sports, news, etc. Meanwhile, one can watch a live football march or a performance on TV.  Through watching TV, one can relax and enjoy many kinds of entertainment with fewer attempts (Rubenoff, 2012). In short, watching TV has greater variety of entertainment. The last aspect displaying the similarities and differences between reading and watching TV is: social interaction. Both of them can be used as conversation starters. The information shown on TV or books can be a favorite subject for everyone to discuss with each other. Moreover, reading book and watching TV are activities that can ease the sense of isolation. When being home alone, one can lie in bed and watch TV or read books. The sound and images on the screen or books can distract one’s attention from the loneliness and the negative thinking. However, one is more likely to get addicted to watching TV; he or she may spend much time watching TV, become a couch potato and not feel like communicating with others. On the other hand, reading books is different. One can also enjoy a book himself or herself so much that he or she â€Å"gets lost† in it. â€Å"In other words, his brain simulates real experiences, just as if he were living them himself† (Hilary, 2012). However, unlike those who watch TV, readers are less likely to get addicted; when their eyes get tired, they can put the books down and go out for a walk or talk with friends. As a result, readers may interact with society better than viewers. To sum up, reading written works and watching TV have both similarities and differences in the activity factor, entertainment and social interaction. Through reading, one can extend the boundary of his or her imagination and relax without being afraid of getting addicted to it. In comparison, watching TV requires less thinking and is easier to become addicted to, but it can supply one with various kinds of entertainment. Taking everything into account, we can say that both reading and watching TV have pros and cons; the point is that we need to know how to balance between them and benefit from them the most. References Hilary, F. (2012, August 25). Getting lost in a good book can help you keep healthy. Retrieved August 19, 2014, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2193496/Getting-lost-good-book-help-healthy.html Ordway, H. (2010, Jan 17). Reading Versus Television: Which is better? Retrieved August 18, 2014 from http://www.hieropraxis.com/2010/01/reading-versus-television-which-is-better/ Rubenoff, T. (2012, October 23). Television vs. Book? Retrieved August 16, 2014 from http://tomrubenoff.hubpages.com/hub/Television-or-Book

Details of Expository Essay Topics for 6th Grade

Details of Expository Essay Topics for 6th Grade You are able to also bring the part of globalization into play over here. Selecting the block structure, firstly, you compose each one of the causes and then all the effects. The ability to give information in various contexts is important to effective communication. Explain'' is to express the info on this issue so as to make it even more understandable to the reader. Nonetheless, it doesn't hurt to look and educate yourself on the complete package of possibilities. When presenting your paper, sometimes it's very good to get some visual aids that will help you out. Planning is critical in any sort of home task, from creating a powerpoint presentation to supplying American Government homework help to your friend. The title that you pick to utilize for your paper will always determine so much about any of this, so far more than you will possibly know about. Regardless of the key goal being the very same, there are expository essay variations you have to be conscious of. Then the next step is going to be to find out more about the expository essay structure. You need to make sure each bit of evidence within the body of your essay strengthens the concept of your thesis in some manner. If you're likely to be writing this kind of essay over and over again, you will need to comprehend how to compose a good one. In this kind of essay, you should describe something without being metaphoric. When you're assigned to compose an expository essay, the very first thing you have to know is the way to write it. An analysis of the recent trends of same-sex marriages and the way in which they affect society ought to be part of your essay. Permit the professional academic writers help to your informative paper! The body of the essay is going to have more info about your primary topic together with your evidence as to why you think that your research is valuable. Finding controversial tips for your argumentsThe topic of every essay will mostly be the key instructions for this kind of essay. Locate the trustworthy information for the essay topic you are likely to work on. The multiple topics could be found, for instance, in the dissertation abstracts international database. Therefore, if you prefer to have nontrivial expository essay topic that necessitates thorough research, choose something which refers to a technological region of study. Expository Essay Topics for 6th Grade - Overview Your essay is supposed to concentrate on why schools insist their students learn a foreign language and the way it can really help in an individual's overall improvement. Since 6th grade students will need to compose essays more frequently, they ought to look up some topics ahead of time. Describe many of the new responsibilities you are going to have when you enter middle school. Explain why some students are made to leave school as soon as they are sixteen. If you're going to compose an expository essay, be ready to devote much time hitting books. Suddenly you end up transported into somebody else's life. Additionally, there are times when you really feel like you don't wish to write something. If an individual feels enthusiastic about something, they'll be prepared to devote much time building a research and will achieve success. Using Expository Essay Topics for 6th Grade You've woken up in the center of the desert. There are lots of subjects out there, with lots of information floating everywhere. Explain the reason it is important to eat healthful foods. The majority of us have a favourite food. Therefore, you should understand each word in your topic. This topic can be ideal for you whether you're as much fashionista for a tech junkie. It is perfect for both who just cannot do without all their earthy possessions as well as for those who believe in delusional aspects of being materialistic. Yes, selecting a topic isn't quick.

To what extent should psychology be considered a science - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 7 Words: 2197 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Psychology Essay Type Argumentative essay Did you like this example? Science and psychology Broadly speaking, science is concerned with the objective, logical study of the material world based on fact, and not opinion or intuition.   It can be defined as a systematic approach that is grounded in logic and which aims to produce data that can be measured, tested, analysed, and reproduced (Lilienfeld, 2010; Lindberg, 2010). Science encompasses all of our accumulated knowledge and discoveries about the universe. Though it featured early on in human history, namely ancient Greece, it has been argued that scientific thought did not reappear again until the European enlightenment because of the difficulties faced by humans in overriding automatic and intuitive modes of thinking (Lilienfeld, 2010). Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "To what extent should psychology be considered a science?" essay for you Create order Psychology on the other hand, is arguably a relatively new domain that has been studied as a distinct discipline in its own right for only a couple of hundred years (Danziger, 2013). Psychology is a multi-faceted and wide-ranging subject that focuses on the study of the mind and behaviour (Henriques, 2004). Many different perspectives have contributed to the study of psychology including behaviourism, developmental and cognitive approaches. The role of psychology as a science has been debated for over one hundred years and continues to generate controversy (Lilienfeld, 2010; Zittoun, Gillespie, and Cornish, 2009). Thus, the following work will discuss to what extent psychology should be considered a science. To achieve this aim, evidence in support of psychology as a science will be considered and evidence against this supposition will be examined. The work will conclude with a summary and analysis of the question under review. In support of psychology as a science Evidence that provides support for the idea that psychology is a science will now be examined. Science is grounded in the empiricism paradigm which postulates that observations and experiences, or data derived from the senses, are the primary way of gaining knowledge (HjÃÆ' ¸rland, 2005). Thus, empirical methods are used to obtain factual information that all can agree on and which is immune from the influence of any researchers (HjÃÆ' ¸rland, 2005). In the scientific approach, double-blind experiments should be utilised wherever possible and subjectivity reduced to the bare minimum (HjÃÆ' ¸rland, 2005). This is because the research ideal in science is to assume that all observations are neutral and not effected by any knowledge, bias, culture, or opinions of the researcher (HjÃÆ' ¸rland, 2005). As per the scientific tradition, research in psychology predominantly relies on collecting objective empirical data from participants, for example through questionnaires, per formance tasks, experimentation, or observation. Therefore, it can be argued that psychology is a science because many researchers use the scientific method of hypothetico-deductivism. Hypothetico-deductivism is a methodology which places emphasis on hypotheses verification or rejection through statistical analyses and significance testing (Haig, 2005). Consequently, in many psychological disciplines the researcher must test a theory or hypothesis by making observational predictions which can be empirically tested (Haig, 2005). The data needs to undergo direct statistical analyses, and if the data supports the predictions made at the outset then the result is viewed as confirming the theory in this instance. On the other hand, if the predictions are not supported by the data then this particular study is viewed as disconfirming the theory under question (Haig, 2005). Predictability in empirical research is important because in this way, researchers can estimate or forecast future behaviour from their results. Another important feature of psychology as a science is that extraneous variables should be controlled as much as possible, and any research conducted should be amenable to replication by other researchers (HjÃÆ' ¸rland, 2005; Lilienfeld, 2010). In this way, cause and effect can be more clearly determined, and if different researchers consistently find the same results then it is more likely that the results are valid and reliable. Consequently, a theory or treatment should only gain acceptance if other investigators are able to provide empirical support for it (Haig, 2005; HjÃÆ' ¸rland, 2005; Lilienfeld, 2010). Accordingly, in parallel with the scientific domain, it can be argued that a major goal of research in psychology is to successfully identify empirical phenomena which subsequently lead to explanation and theory construction (Haig, 2005). Behaviourism is one dominant example of empiricism and scientific thought in psychology. It should be noted that behaviourism in its original form is now considered outdated and too simplistic to account for the complexity of human behaviour. Nevertheless, it has been contended that it facilitated the focus on scientific principles and was the precursor to experimental research in areas such as cognitive, clinical, and developmental psychology (Costall, 2006; Moore, 2011). The foundation of behaviourism is the premise that behaviours are derived from learned associations between a stimulus and a response (Moore, 2011; Padoa-Schioppa, 2008). In other words, behaviourism proposes that all behaviours (including feelings, thoughts, and actions) are a result of events external to the individual and that organisms respond to stimuli in automatic ways and following universal laws (HjÃÆ' ¸rland, 2005). It is clear that behaviourism is a highly scientific approach. Indeed Skinner, a prominent behaviourist, stated in relation to research it is science or nothing (1971, p. 160).    Behaviourism posits that psychology should be studied scientifically with attention focused on observable behaviours rather than internal processes (Moore, 2011). Behaviourism is often regarded as a direct reaction to the unscientific and introspective nature of psychoanalysis, a perspective which dominated psychology in the early 20th century (Costall, 2006; Moore, 2011). Comparatively, behaviourisms major strengths were that it was highly objective, was applicable to both humans and animals, and was highly replicable (HjÃÆ' ¸rland, 2005; Moore, 2011). Another perspective that provides support for psychology being a science is the cognitive approach. It has been argued that the cognitive approach replaced behaviourism as the dominant paradigm in psychology (Costall, 2006; Gardner, 2008). Cognitive psychology returned focus to the importance of mental processes rather than concentrating solely on environmental factors as behaviourism had done (Gardner, 2008). The basic pr emise of cognitive psychology is to examine how mental processes contribute to human emotions, behaviour, and thinking (Gardner, 2008). Nevertheless, although investigating unobservable phenomena may seem unscientific, cognitive psychology continues to use the rigorous experimental methods and robust statistical analyses of behaviourism (Gardner, 2008). Therefore, in line with the hypothetico-deductive method cognitive psychologists develop precise theoretical hypotheses and then conduct well-controlled experiments in order to confirm or reject them (Gardner, 2008; Haig, 2005). By applying scientific methods researchers in the cognitive discipline are able to investigate complex systems such as information processing, language, attention, memory, and the effects of brain injury on cognition (Gardner, 2008). Against psychology as a science Hitherto evidence in support of psychology as a science has been examined; now arguments which contradict this notion will be considered. One important factor to consider when determining the scientific nature of psychology is that due to the complexity of brain function and human behaviour, control of all extraneous variables is almost impossible. For instance, in a study examining the relationship between depression and eating habits a psychologist would not be able to truly control for a persons childhood experiences. In addition, much of the research in psychology does not employ double-blind procedures, even in studies of a clinical nature where it would be advantageous to do so (Lilienfeld, 2010). It is also likely that a researcher can never be completely certain that their hypothesis is true because psychological processes occur in the mind and are not readily accessible. It is interesting that although the hypothetico-deductive approach to research is held in great este em by many scientists and psychologists, it has also been heavily criticised (Haig, 2005). It has been argued that approaching research using the principles of empiricism means that the role of language and culture in psychological processes tend to be neglected (HjÃÆ' ¸rland, 2005). Furthermore, the nature of empirical studies means that generalisations are made by studying one population which may not be representative of all groups (HjÃÆ' ¸rland, 2005). It can be difficult to reconcile psychology with science when human behaviour varies across situations and over time. This means that testing an individual at one particular instance and situation is unlikely to provide an absolute explanation of any behaviour. It is evident that there is a division within psychology as to how scientific it should be, which is determined by ones perspective and priorities. For example, Lilienfeld (2010) strongly supports the idea that psychology should be a science but argues that a major threat to scientific psychology is the failure of empirical research to prevent or control confirmation bias. Confirmation bias is against scientific ideals because it involves the tendency for academics to look for evidence consistent with their hypotheses and to ignore, deny, or alter evidence that is in contrast to them (Lilienfeld, 2010).   Thus, psychology is hindered by the desire of researchers to see what they want to see, and this has facilitated dubious science, non-science, and even pseudoscience to take root and flourish in many quarters (Lilienfeld, 2010, p. 282). Another pertinent point is that not all areas of psychology adhere to strict methodological stipulations and are actually opposed to the idea of psychology being a science. For example, the humanistic psychology movement, which developed in the 1950s and 1960s partly as a reaction to psychoanalysis and behaviourism, emphasises the importance of an individuals subjective way of thinking and personal perception (Elkins, 2008). For humanist psychologists, science has little place in psychology because only by investigating subjective experience can a true understanding of behaviour be realised (Elkins, 2008). Thus, humanists do not support empirical research involving rigorous testing and control and instead champion the precepts of free will, richness of experience and subjective understanding. Humanists acknowledge the importance of the therapeutic relationship and the focus on an individuals strengths (Elkins, 2008). Prominent supporters of humanistic psychology included Allport, Maslow, and Rogers (Elkins, 2008). Indeed, Carl Rogers developed client-centred therapy and was considered at one point the most influential psychologist in America (Elkins, 2008). Supporters of the humanistic perspective lament the dehumanising and deterministic nature of current psychology and humanisms fall from favour (Elkins, 2008). They point out that despite the dominance of objective and sc ientific psychology, humanistic ideas permeate mainstream psychology and therapy (Elkins, 2008). It has been argued that mainstream, scientific psychology continues to undermine humanistic psychology and does not acknowledge its contributions to theory and academic literature (Elkins, 2008). Conclusion In summary, the extent to which psychology should be considered a science is a complex area of debate. Evidence in support of psychologys scientific nature emphasises the benefits of conducting psychology research in line with the principles of hypothetico-deductivism such as greater control, replicability, and robust statistical analyses. Similar to science, in many areas of psychology objectivity is paramount, whilst subjectivity is frowned upon. For example, in the behaviourism and cognitive disciplines empirical research and the control of variables are highly important. Furthermore, some psychologists argue that psychology as a whole should be scientific and can be improved by following scientific principles (Lilienfeld, 2010). On the other hand, there are pitfalls to examining complex psychological processes in a scientific way such as difficulties with generalising findings to different populations, the practical impossibility of maintaining true control over all extraneous variables, and issues with conducting double-blind experiments. In addition, it could be argued that psychology cannot be considered a science when confirmation bias remains so rampant in the field (Lilienfeld, 2010). Naturally, humanistic psychologists approach the debate from a different standpoint and wholly reject psychology as a science. They posit that mainstream psychologys emphasis on laboratory experiments and objectivity has come at the cost of truly understanding individual experience and free will. Therefore, humanistic psychologists do not believe that psychology benefits from being (or trying to be) a science; rather psychologists should try to understand human behaviour from the perspective of the individual (Elkins, 2008). Consequently, it seems that psychology can be considered a science to a large extent. Nonetheless, its focus on the processes of the mind and behaviour means that it should not ignore potentially valuable, yet subjective, areas of investigation. However, one views psychology as a subject it is likely that its scientific identity will continue to cause controversy. References Costall, A., (2006) Introspectionism and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 634-654. Danziger, K., (2013) Psychology and its history. Theory Psychology, vol.23, no. 6, pp. 829-839. Elkins, D. N., (2008) Why humanistic psychology lost its power and influence in American psychology: Implications for advancing humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 267-291. Gardner, H., (2008)The Minds New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Basic Books. Haig, B. D., (2005) An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 371-388. Henriques, G. R., (2004) Psychology defined.Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 1207-1221. HjÃÆ' ¸rland, B., (2005) Empiricism, rationalism and positivism in library and information science. Journal of Documentation,vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 130-155. Lilienfeld, S. O., (2010) Can psych ology become a science? Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 281-288. Lindberg, D. C., (2010) The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, Prehistory to AD 1450. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Moore, J., (2011) Philosophy of science, with special consideration given to behaviorism as the philosophy of the science of behavior. Psychological Record, vol.60, no. 1, pp. 132-136. Padoa-Schioppa, C., (2008) The syllogism of neuro-economics. Economics and Philosophy, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 449-457. Skinner, B. F., (1971) Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Bantam. Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., and Cornish, F., (2009) Fragmentation or differentiation: Questioning the crisis in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 104-115.